Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Analysis & Tools
  3. Publications

Debt Policy of State-Owned Mining Enterprises in Mongolia

Report
29 September 2022
Author
Andrew BauerBatpurev Ayushsuren
Download
Debt Policy of State-Owned Mining Enterprises in Mongolia (PDF 1.1 MB)
Topics
State-owned enterprises
Countries
Mongolia
Social Sharing
Монгол »

Key messages
  • Mongolia relies heavily on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to manage several key mining assets. Baganuur, Shivee Ovoo, Erdenet, Mongolrostsvetmet and Erdenes Tavan Tolgoi are the most important majority state-owned companies operating large-scale mines.
  • From 2019 to 2021, debt held by mining SOEs increased 4.3 times. The total liabilities of these companies reached USD 2.3 billion, representing 15 percent of GDP. The new debt was largely issued to cover social spending and an economically questionable railway project. It is unclear how the government intends to service this debt, particularly since profitability at most mining SOEs has been weak and most face liquidity challenges.
  • Mining SOEs’ poor financial health is due to the combination of quasi-fiscal activity financing, poor project selection and management, and inadequate legislation and control mechanisms for new debt issuance.
  • Legal reforms to new debt issuance and stronger Ministry of Finance oversight of SOEs are needed, in addition to stricter implementation of existing legal requirements such as collecting and disclosing complete data on SOE debt. Mongolia’s government should also review mining SOE quasi-fiscal expenditures, such as price controls on coal, and other reasons for low profitability of mines.
Mongolia’s 10 most important upstream mining state-owned enterprises (SOEs) reported total liabilities of 6.45 trillion Mongolian tugrug (MNT) (around USD 2.3 billion) at the end of 2021, of which 26 percent could be classified as “debt.” The liabilities of these 10 companies alone represented 15 percent of GDP, while liabilities officially declared as “debt” represented four percent of GDP. In comparison, around the world, SOE debt from all sectors is equivalent to roughly seven percent of GDP on average. While SOE debt can be a useful source of financing for economic development projects, Mongolia’s mining SOE debt issuances represent a significant risk to economic stability and fiscal sustainability.

Mining SOE debt is 4.3 times larger than in 2019, while liabilities are 4.8 times greater. The biggest increases came from bond issuances from Erdenes Tavan Tolgoi to pay for the Gashuun Sukhait railway project, and Erdenes Mongol to pay for the government’s policy to cover pension-backed loans and other subsidies to the elderly. In other words, the government has collateralized future revenues of mining SOEs to pay for projects that may not actually contribute to SOEs’ improved performance.

In addition, mining SOE profitability is well below international standards and is highly dependent on volatile coal and copper prices. Three out of Mongolia’s five state-owned operating mines make little or no profit. Borrowing to finance long-term state-owned projects of unclear feasibility risks throwing good money after bad.Given these high costs and the global energy transition, it is unclear whether mining SOEs will be able to pay back their debt. More likely, the government will need to cover mining SOEs’ losses in the future using taxpayers’ money, shifting state resources away from programs that would benefit the majority, such as investments in education, healthcare and modernizing infrastructure.

Related content

Объявление о приеме заявок на Евразийский Медиа Курс

Event type: 
Training
Wednesday, March 1, 2017 - 09:00 to Friday, March 31, 2017 - 17:00
Стамбул, Турция

Eurasia Media Course on Extractives

Event type: 
Training
Wednesday, March 1, 2017 - 09:00 to Friday, March 31, 2017 - 17:00
Istanbul, Turkey

NRGI’s Top 10 Blog Posts in 2017

10 December 2017

A 2017 Year-End Message from NRGI President and CEO Daniel Kaufmann

Daniel Kaufmann
14 December 2017

Local Level Agreements in Mongolia: A Need for Government Leadership and Policy Clarity

Byambajav Dalaibuyan
17 April 2018
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search