Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Analysis & Tools
  3. Publications

Step by Step: Closing the Implementation Gap in Senegal's Petroleum Licensing Process

Briefing
17 December 2021
Author
Papa Daouda DieneNicola Woodroffe
Download
Step by Step: Closing the Implementation Gap in Senegal Petroleum Licensing Process (PDF 505.33 KB)
Topics
Legislation and regulation
Countries
Senegal
Social Sharing
Français »

Key messages
  • Historically, Senegal has experienced significant “implementation gaps” between rules and implementation of these rules in its petroleum licensing process. Causes have included lack of legal clarity, duplicative and conflicting institutional roles, and lack of institutional capacity.
  • However, Senegal has made good progress on closing this implementation gap. As of 2020, Senegal’s implementation gap in the petroleum licensing process as measured by the Resource Governance Index is very small and reflects recent government reforms, investments and disclosures.
  • Despite major progress in closing the implementation gap in the licensing process, Senegal has significant room for improvement in the transparency of the oil and gas licensing process. Senegal’s government should work to improve laws on the disclosure of assets of public officials and the disclosure of the identities of the beneficial owners of companies applying for and obtaining licenses.
Many sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries have reformed their extractive industry legal frameworks to improve the governance of their natural resources. However, they are failing to reap the full benefits of these reforms due to the lack of implementation of the new rules, referred to here as an “implementation gap.” According to Global Integrity, one of the pioneers in the concept, an “implementation gap” is the difference
between a country’s legal framework for good governance and anticorruption, and the actual implementation or enforcement of that same legal framework.

The 2017 Resource Governance Index (RGI) started measuring this gap between law and practice, finding that among the 81 countries assessed, the gap was widest in countries exhibiting the worst overall extractive sector governance. In most SSA countries, resource governance practices lag improved legal frameworks. While no RGI assessment was conducted for Senegal in 2017, Senegal has historically struggled to implement the licensing requirements of its 1998 Hydrocarbon Code and regulations, as detailed further below. But the 2021 RGI found no significant implementation gap in Senegal’s hydrocarbons sector, including in the licensing process, reflecting recent government efforts to address the root causes of this gap. However, while Senegal’s practices in oil and gas licensing are now in line with its legal framework, the licensing transparency and disclosure requirements in the legal framework itself are still insufficient.

This briefing:
  • Explores significant implementation gaps shown by Senegal’s hydrocarbon sector licensing regime since the discovery of significant hydrocarbon reserves in 2014.
  • Details the steps the government took to reduce those gaps.
  • Highlights areas for further improvement to the petroleum licensing process.

Related content

Pas à pas, combler les lacunes dans la mise en œuvre des procédures d’octroi des licences d’exploitation pétrolière au Sénégal

Briefing
17 December 2021
Papa Daouda DieneNicola Woodroffe

Who Gets to Get Rich? Lessons from BP’s Senegal Payout

Alexandra Gillies
10 June 2019

Opportunités et défis pour le Sénégal dans le domaine de la production pétrolière et gazière : Enseignements tirés de l’expérience d’autres nouveaux producteurs

Briefing
18 May 2021
William DavisDavid Mihalyi

Le Gouvernement sénégalais pourrait renforcer le régime fiscal et respecter les termes de contrat pour tirer parti des réserves de gaz

Press Release
18 May 2021

Opportunités et défis pour le Sénégal dans le domaine de la production pétrolière et gazière

Event type: 
Web Event
Tuesday, June 8, 2021 - 09:30 to 11:30
Online
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search