Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Approach
  3. Natural Resource Charter

Precept 11: Roles of international companies

Companies should commit to the highest environmental, social and human rights standards and contribute to sustainable development.

Private sector companies in extractive industry projects should take steps that go beyond minimum legal requirements to respect the highest environmental, social and human rights standards; avoid corruption; contribute to sustainable development outcomes; and make public and accessible the relevant project information.

Companies should commit to preventing, reducing and remediating any potential negative environmental, social or human rights impacts of their activities; and they should be accountable to the host government for these commitments. They should also require their partners, contractors and subcontractors make similar commitments. These include the assessment and management of potential local and regional impacts of the project, including impacts uniquely experienced by people of various races, ethnicities, genders, ages or other such traits. Both governments and companies should fully account for the rights of indigenous peoples in particular. Where free, prior and informed consent to extraction is required by law, companies must obtain consent ahead of any work taking place on indigenous lands, and should furthermore meaningfully engage and consult with local communities that may be significantly affected by extractive operations. Companies should ensure that funds are available for these commitments throughout the life cycle of the project, planning ahead for periods of low or no revenue, such as a when the extraction project closes.

Abstain from corrupt practices

See Precept 2 on accountability.

Multinational companies should act in accordance with national law, and international agreements and norms, which increasingly recognize bribery of government officials as a crime. Companies should have clear internal policies relating to corruption, including procedures and controls that prevent and punish corrupt practices by employees, contractors, subcontractors or their agents.

Contribute to sustainable development outcomes

See Precept 10 on economic development from local content.

Companies should support the host state’s efforts to maximize potential benefits arising from extractive activities. For example, if local content development is appropriate in the country, governments may work with companies to provide the long-term commitments necessary to spur investment in local industry. Company cooperation may also come in the form of training and employment initiatives to improve the quality of local suppliers. Such partnerships are vital for reducing discord and strengthening capacity.

Where companies provide ancillary goods or services such as rail or road infrastructure, which are not directly related to the extractive activity or to mitigating its impacts, they should do so in a manner consistent with the operating standards of the extractive project and ensure the maintenance or responsible handover of such goods and services beyond the life cycle of the project.

With respect to contractual stability, government assurances to companies should be limited to non-discriminatory treatment clauses. Companies should not ask for, expect, or accept provisions for exemptions or compensation for changes in the statutory or regulatory framework related to human rights, environmental controls, health and safety, and labor.

Provide relevant project information

See Precept 2 on transparency.

Companies should support and comply with public disclosure requirements. These include the contracts between government and companies, which should clearly state the financial terms in an easily understandable manner. The only justifiable exception for time-bound confidentiality relates to businesses’ proprietary information, which could directly affect the position of one of the parties in a concurrent or imminent negotiation. Companies should make readily available any reports regarding potential impacts on people, their internationally protected human rights, or the environment, including relevant assessment data, and prevention, mitigation and remediation plans. Governments and companies should work together to ensure that information is available in a timely, accessible and usable manner.

For more information about implementing the principles of the Natural Resource Charter precepts, click here.

Read more

    Publications

    Twelve Red Flags: Corruption Risks in the Award of Extractive Sector Licenses and Contracts

    6 April 2017
    Aaron SayneAlexandra GilliesAndrew Watkins

    Recommandations relatives à la divulgation de la propriété réelle dans le cadre de l’ITIE en République démocratique du Congo

    7 November 2016
    Marie LintzerAmir Shafaie

    Indonesia’s Oil and Gas Legislation: Critical Issues

    25 October 2016

    Beneficial Ownership: Tackling Hidden Company Ownership Through Myanmar's EITI Process

    8 September 2016

    Initial Evidence of Corruption Risks in Government Oil and Gas Sales

    23 June 2016
    Aaron SayneAlexandra Gillies

    Pages

    • First page
    • Previous page
    • …
    • Page 3
    • Currently on page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • …
    • Next page
    • Last page
    more

    Tools

    ResourceProjects.org

    Natural Resource Charter Benchmarking Framework

    The Natural Resource Charter in Myanmar (pamphlet)

    News & Insights

    U.K. Financial Regulator Confirms Extractive Companies Must Name Government Entities to Which They Make Payments

    Joseph WilliamsMiles Litvinoff
    25 April 2019

    Contract Disclosure Good for Business in Myanmar, Total Says

    Sebastian Sahla
    23 April 2019

    Governments, Companies Find a Bit of Common Ground on Resource Nationalism at Indaba

    Kaisa ToroskainenSilas Olan'g
    4 March 2019

    NRGI's Daniel Kaufmann Discusses Governance, Capture and Corruption at #KAPTalks (Facebook video)

    European Commission - Development & Cooperation - EuropeAid
    1 March 2019

    It’s Time for EITI to Require Contract Transparency. Here are Four Reasons Why.

    Robert PitmanIsabel Munilla
    22 February 2019

    Pages

    • First page
    • Previous page
    • …
    • Page 3
    • Currently on page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • …
    • Next page
    • Last page

    Other Precepts

    P1
    Precept 1: Strategy, consultation and institutions
    Resource management should secure the greatest benefit for citizens through an inclusive and comprehensive national strategy, a clear legal framework, and competent institutions.
    P2
    Precept 2: Accountability and transparency
    Resource governance requires decision makers to be accountable to an informed public.
    P3
    Precept 3: Exploration and license allocation
    The government should encourage efficient exploration and production operations, and allocate rights transparently.
    P4
    Precept 4: Taxation
    Tax regimes and contractual terms should enable the government to realize the full value of its resources consistent with attracting necessary investment, and should be robust to changing circumstances.
    P5
    Precept 5: Local effects
    The government should pursue opportunities for local benefits, and account for, mitigate and offset the environmental and social costs of resource projects.
    P6
    Precept 6: Nationally owned resource companies
    Nationally owned resource companies should be accountable, with well-defined mandates and an objective of commercial and operational efficiency.
    P7
    Precept 7: Revenue distribution
    The government should invest revenues to achieve optimal and equitable outcomes, for current and future generations.
    P8
    Precept 8: Revenue volatility
    The government should smooth domestic spending of revenues to accommodate revenue volatility.
    P9
    Precept 9: Government spending
    The government should use revenues as an opportunity to increase the efficiency of public spending at the national and sub-national levels.
    P10
    Precept 10: Private sector development
    The government should facilitate private sector investments to diversify the economy and to engage in the extractive industry.
    P12
    Precept 12: Role of international community
    Governments and international organizations should promote an upward harmonization of standards to support sustainable development.

    Related events

    Natural Resources for Sustainable Development: The Fundamentals of Oil, Gas, and Mining Governance

    Event type: 
    Training
    Monday, February 1, 2016 - 09:00 to Sunday, April 24, 2016 - 17:00
    Online

    International Anti-Corruption Conference

    Event type: 
    Conference
    Thursday, September 3, 2015 - 13:30
    Putrajaya, Malaysia

    2015 Natural Resource Governance Institute Conference

    Event type: 
    Conference
    Thursday, June 25, 2015 - 13:30 to Friday, June 26, 2015 - 13:30
    Oxford, United Kingdom

    The Power of Data

    Event type: 
    Discussion
    Thursday, October 9, 2014 - 13:45
    Washington, DC, USA

    2014 Natural Resource Charter Conference

    Event type: 
    Conference
    Thursday, June 12, 2014 - 14:00 to Saturday, June 14, 2014 - 14:00
    Oxford, United Kingdom

    Pages

    • First page
    • Previous page
    • …
    • Page 3
    • Currently on page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • …
    • Next page
    • Last page
    more
    Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
    Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
    • Topics
      Beneficial ownership
      Civic space
      Commodity prices
      Contract transparency and monitoring
      Coronavirus
      Corruption
      Economic diversification
      Energy transition
      Gender
      Global initiatives
      Legislation and regulation
      Licensing and negotiation
      Mandatory payment disclosure
      Measurement of environmental and social impacts
      Measurement of governance
      Open data
      Revenue management
      Revenue sharing
      Sovereign wealth funds
      State-owned enterprises
      Subnational governance
      Tax policy and revenue collection
    • Approach
      • Stakeholders
      • Natural Resource Charter
      • Regional knowledge hubs
    • Priority
      Countries
      • Colombia
      • Dem. Rep. of Congo
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Mexico
      • Mongolia
      • Nigeria
      • Peru
      • Senegal
      • Tanzania
      • Tunisia
      • Uganda
    • Learning
      • Training
      • Primers
    • Analysis & Tools
      • Publications
      • Tools
      • Economic models
    • About Us
      • What we do
      • NRGI impact
      • Board of Directors
      • Emeritus Board Members
      • Advisory Council
      • Leadership team
      • Experts and staff
      • Careers and opportunities
      • Grant-making
      • Financials
      • Privacy policy
      • Contact us
    • News
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Search