Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Approach
  3. Natural Resource Charter

Precept 9: Government spending

The government should use revenues as an opportunity to increase the efficiency of public spending at the national and sub-national levels.

Resource revenues are an opportunity for governments to increase their capacity to undertake public spending, and to increase the capacity of the economy to absorb further investment. These efforts can clear the way for further investments that deliver high returns for the country, and allow for equitable enjoyment of these returns.

Manage spending policies to avoid economic deterioration

Much cash has flowed into Chad’s government treasury from resource extraction—70 percent of government revenues come from oil. However, rather than translating this into human development, money has instead been spent on security services totaling 18 percent of the budget. The result is a growing stock of debt and 184th in the ranking of countries in the Human Development Index.
—Africa Progress Panel, 2013.

In countries with weak public spending bureaucracies and small economies, effective investment can be challenging. First, government bureaucracy may be too small to manage larger budgets, requiring more project selection and assessment. Second, high expenditure of resource revenues can affect the wider economy, causing inflationary pressures, and thus may reduce the value of the revenues. Third, resource extraction may increase inequality: leading to public calls for reform or, at the extreme, conflict. Finally, poor transparency and accountability can lead to high rates of leakage throughout the spending process.

Without active management, the inflow of revenues can harm rather than help a country. Fortunately, while resource revenues are a threat in this regard, they can also provide the opportunity to move countries out of a state of weak bureaucratic capability and build the absorptive capacity of the economy.

Improve public spending management

See Precept 10 on increasing absorptive capacity

Improvement in public spending management can take the form of both an increase in the capacity to choose appropriate spending plans, and incentives for institutions to make decisions without political interference. In countries with low institutional capacity it may be politically easier to introduce improved, stricter management rules for new spending projects than to reform existing spending. Governments should aim for the following in their public financial management systems.

Nigeria reformed its public procurement process in 1999. Previously, on average US$300 million was lost each year in corrupt practices. Since reform the federal government has saved an estimated US$1.5 billion between 2001 and 2007 in the form of reductions contract prices.
—Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and Philip Osafo-Kwaako, 2007.
  • Public, multi-year plans that allow coordination of spending projects, and greater certainty for the private sector
  • Competitive, public and transparent procurement (if there is sufficient interest from bidders)
  • Oversight and internal controls
  • Pre-approval measurement of the costs of major expenditures against their likely social and economic benefits
  • Public, independent audits of spending projects, for both oversight and to help government improve its spending processes
  • Expenditures made on-budget rather than through savings funds or equivalent institutions, to ensure the official checks are applied
  • Invest in public investment processes and in eliminating supply bottlenecks in the economy to reduce the cost of investment projects.

Resource extraction, and the investment and spending it generates, can often have the indirect effect of driving up the costs of public investment to levels higher than global norms. Proactive public policy can reduce these costs and improve the economy’s capacity to absorb increased investment.

For more information about implementing the principles of the Natural Resource Charter precepts, click here.

Read more

    Publications

    Political Parties and Natural Resource Governance: A Practical Guide for Developing Resource Policy Positions

    5 April 2018

    Premature Funds: How Overenthusiasm and Bad Advice Can Leave Countries Poorer

    5 January 2018
    Andrew BauerDavid Mihalyi

    Uncertain Potential: Managing Tanzania’s Gas Revenues

    11 September 2017
    Thomas ScurfieldDavid Mihalyi

    Улучшение управления минеральными ресурсами в Кыргызской Республике: 12 приоритетных вопросов для горнодобывающего сектора

    28 April 2017

    Improving Resource Governance in the Kyrgyz Republic: 12 Priority Issues for the Mining Sector

    28 April 2017

    Pages

    • First page
    • Previous page
    • …
    • Page 4
    • Currently on page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • …
    • Next page
    • Last page
    more

    Tools

    World Economic Outlook Forecast Tracker

    Mongolia Macro-fiscal Model

    The Natural Resource Charter in Myanmar (pamphlet)

    Natural Resource Charter Benchmarking Framework

    more

    News & Insights

    Appointing AG as External Auditor for Natural Resource Fund a Wrong Move

    Kaieteur News (Guyana)
    9 November 2018

    Governance Risk Leader: Broadening the Scope of Governance Assessments

    Mining Journal World Risk Report 2018 (paywall)
    28 October 2018

    Green Paper On Natural Resource Fund Has Strong Points But Fundamental Weaknesses-NRGI Official

    Guyana Standard
    25 October 2018

    Global Governance to Combat Illicit Financial Flows series

    Council on Foreign Relations
    11 October 2018

    Leveraging Beneficial Ownership Information in the Extractive Sector

    Council on Foreign Relations
    11 October 2018

    Pages

    • First page
    • Previous page
    • …
    • Page 4
    • Currently on page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • …
    • Next page
    • Last page

    Other Precepts

    P1
    Precept 1: Strategy, consultation and institutions
    Resource management should secure the greatest benefit for citizens through an inclusive and comprehensive national strategy, a clear legal framework, and competent institutions.
    P2
    Precept 2: Accountability and transparency
    Resource governance requires decision makers to be accountable to an informed public.
    P3
    Precept 3: Exploration and license allocation
    The government should encourage efficient exploration and production operations, and allocate rights transparently.
    P4
    Precept 4: Taxation
    Tax regimes and contractual terms should enable the government to realize the full value of its resources consistent with attracting necessary investment, and should be robust to changing circumstances.
    P5
    Precept 5: Local effects
    The government should pursue opportunities for local benefits, and account for, mitigate and offset the environmental and social costs of resource projects.
    P6
    Precept 6: Nationally owned resource companies
    Nationally owned resource companies should be accountable, with well-defined mandates and an objective of commercial and operational efficiency.
    P7
    Precept 7: Revenue distribution
    The government should invest revenues to achieve optimal and equitable outcomes, for current and future generations.
    P8
    Precept 8: Revenue volatility
    The government should smooth domestic spending of revenues to accommodate revenue volatility.
    P10
    Precept 10: Private sector development
    The government should facilitate private sector investments to diversify the economy and to engage in the extractive industry.
    P11
    Precept 11: Roles of international companies
    Companies should commit to the highest environmental, social and human rights standards and contribute to sustainable development.
    P12
    Precept 12: Role of international community
    Governments and international organizations should promote an upward harmonization of standards to support sustainable development.

    Related events

    Fundar Launches First Annual Report on the Extractive Industries in Mexico

    Event type: 
    Discussion
    Tuesday, June 6, 2017 - 10:00 to 12:30
    Mexico City

    Harnessing Natural Resources for Development

    Event type: 
    Training
    Monday, August 13, 2018 - 08:00 to Friday, August 17, 2018 - 15:00
    Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Institution-Building, Governance and Compliance in Brazil: Politics, Policy and Business

    Event type: 
    Discussion
    Tuesday, February 7, 2017 - 14:00 to 17:00
    New York

    Introducing Petronia: A Launch and Discussion on Gaming for Good Governance

    Event type: 
    Discussion
    Wednesday, June 13, 2018 - 17:30 to 19:00
    Washington, D.C.

    Lanzamiento de reporte: Administración de transparencia de contratos y la Comisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos de México

    Event type: 
    Discussion
    Wednesday, January 18, 2017 - 18:00 to 19:30
    Ciudad de México

    Pages

    • First page
    • Previous page
    • …
    • Page 4
    • Currently on page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Next page
    • Last page
    more
    Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
    Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
    • Topics
      Beneficial ownership
      Civic space
      Commodity prices
      Contract transparency and monitoring
      Coronavirus
      Corruption
      Economic diversification
      Energy transition
      Gender
      Global initiatives
      Legislation and regulation
      Licensing and negotiation
      Mandatory payment disclosure
      Measurement of environmental and social impacts
      Measurement of governance
      Open data
      Revenue management
      Revenue sharing
      Sovereign wealth funds
      State-owned enterprises
      Subnational governance
      Tax policy and revenue collection
    • Approach
      • Stakeholders
      • Natural Resource Charter
      • Regional knowledge hubs
    • Priority
      Countries
      • Colombia
      • Dem. Rep. of Congo
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Mexico
      • Mongolia
      • Nigeria
      • Peru
      • Senegal
      • Tanzania
      • Tunisia
      • Uganda
    • Learning
      • Training
      • Primers
    • Analysis & Tools
      • Publications
      • Tools
      • Economic models
    • About Us
      • What we do
      • NRGI impact
      • Board of Directors
      • Emeritus Board Members
      • Advisory Council
      • Leadership team
      • Experts and staff
      • Careers and opportunities
      • Grant-making
      • Financials
      • Privacy policy
      • Contact us
    • News
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Search