Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Call for ResourceContracts.org Usage Grants

23 May 2016
Author
Anders Pedersen
Topics
Contract transparency and monitoringOpen data
Stakeholders
Civil society actorsJournalists and mediaPrivate sector
Precepts
P2 P3 P4 P11 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

The partners behind ResourceContracts.org are announcing a call for proposals for five grants of up to USD 10,000. CSOs, researchers, think tanks and journalists are encouraged to apply. Others are also welcome to apply.

We encourage proposals that stimulate innovative use of the contract data; catalyze creative methods for contract analysis to gain new insights into contracts available through ResourceContracts; and promote improved understanding of extractive investments and their implications. Project outcomes can include reports, technical trainings, data-driven and contract analysis, or data visualizations where ResourceContracts data is utilized as a core component.

About ResourceContracts.org

ResourceContracts.org is an online, searchable, user-friendly repository of publicly available oil, gas and mining contracts from around the world. It is curated by the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI), the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI) and the World Bank. ResourceContracts.org intends to reduce information asymmetries in natural resource contracting. ResourceContracts.org provides data and tools for policymakers, communities and investors to search, download, analyze and monitor existing contracts and to use this knowledge to inform future deals.

The site currently hosts more than 1,100 contracts and associated documents from more than 70 countries. It covers more than 30 different resources. Users can search contracts by country, natural resource or type of contract; view and download summaries of key social, environmental, fiscal and operational provisions; and download the contracts as open data. Each contract is made available as machine-readable text using high-quality optical character recognition and more than 180 of these contracts are annotated to provide summaries of key provisions.

Contracts have previously been locked up within PDF documents. By making the contracts searchable with comprehensive metadata, the project aims to enable data-driven contract analysis.

Possible project examples

Projects could, for example, include:

  • Analysis of contract annotations: Use the contracts and features available through ResourceContracts.org to conduct analysis of annotated contracts and their terms. For example, projects could seek to compare a specific type of contractual term across contracts to discern relevant trends and develop suggestions for improvement of contracts based on such analysis.
  • Contract text mining using for example R or Elastic Search: Use the ResourceContracts API to compare text from multiple contracts to compare key terms, clauses and provisions.
  • Analysis of contracts and project-level data: Use new project payment disclosures along with contracts to understand fiscal revenues from extractives activities and to highlight public interest implications of these activities. Project-level data from across countries are available at ResourceProjects.org or from government disclosure sources (such as Companies House in the United Kingdom).
  • Policy research: Analyze contracts the degree to which provisions conform to generally applicable legislation and to regional and international practice. One could provide policy input on how new legislation or regulations could address previous shortcomings, and priorities for future contracts to be awarded.
  • Workshop and trainings: ResourceContracts.org could be used as part of a technical training for CSOs or journalists. Workshops or trainings should focus on contract analysis (including how to use ResourceContracts to better understand oil, gas and mining contracts and their implications) and data use.
  • Contract retrieval and analysis: Retrieve, standardize and analyze new contracts not currently available at ResourceContracts.org.
  • Standardization: Analyze and demonstrate use cases of the Open Contracting Data Standard for extractives contracts.
  • Journalism: Use the contracts available through ResourceContracts.org (along with other extractives sources such as company or geospatial data) to carry out research on a specific country, company or commodity, and use these findings to shape reports, web products and/ or articles.

Requirements

General requirements for the grants include:

  • Types of data use: Applicants should use data available at ResourceContracts (metadata, the contract text or annotations) as main source of projects. Additionally, we encourage applicants to use other datasets from sources such as EITI, geospatial databases, the SEC or data found and generated by CSOs.
  • Demonstrating use: The grants are focused on demonstrating the application and utility of contract texts and data. Projects should use data from the site as a central element, and applications should spell out a strategy for how the data analysis or interpretation will have an impact on policy debates within a particular resource-rich country or internationally.
  • Openly licensed: The product (including code base to utilize the data) must be openly licensed (for example, under CC-BY-SA, MIT or a similar license in accordance with the Open Definition).

Grant selection will be done by NRGI, CCSI and the World Bank, the partners behind ResourceContracts.org.

To apply, complete this application form by 17 June.

For questions about the grant, you are welcome to reach out to Anders Pedersen, [email protected]

Related content

Lanzamiento de reporte: Administración de transparencia de contratos y la Comisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos de México

Event type: 
Discussion
Wednesday, January 18, 2017 - 18:00 to 19:30
Ciudad de México

Twelve Ways EITI Stakeholders Can Improve Contract and License Disclosure

Robert Pitman
7 March 2017

Tullow Disclosure Yields Insight into Ghana Oil, Gas Sector

David Mihalyi
15 May 2017

Natural Resource Charter Benchmarking Framework: 170 Crucial Questions for Resource-Rich Countries

Robert PitmanDavid Manley
17 October 2016

Six Transparency Steps Toward Better Extractives Governance in Ukraine

Robert Pitman
7 August 2017
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search