Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Developing a Regional Framework for Extractive Industries in Southeast Asia

27 January 2014
Author
Emanuel BriaMorentalisa Hutapea
Topics
Contract transparency and monitoringCorruptionLicensing and negotiation
Countries
IndonesiaMyanmarPhilippinesVietnamCambodiaLaosMalaysiaTimor-Leste
Stakeholders
Civil society actorsGovernment officialsJournalists and mediaPrivate sector
Precepts
P1 P2 P3 P4 P12 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

Natural resource extraction drives many economies in Southeast Asia, and foreign direct investment (FDI) in the extractive sector is at historic highs.

In Indonesia, for example, based on data from BKPM (Coordinating Board of Foreign Investment), the mining sector accounted for 20.7 percent of total FDI in the third quarter of 2013, while in Malaysia, in 2011, the mining and quarrying sector accounted for 22.2 percent of total investments. And in Laos, from 1989 to 2012, 27 percent of FDI was directed towards the mining sector.

Revenues from natural resources also contribute significantly to the national budget in several countries in the region. In Brunei, oil and gas revenues account for more than 85 percent of the national budget. In Timor-Leste, resource revenues fund more than 90 percent. Even large countries like Indonesia and Malaysia receive more than 30 percent of their annual budget from oil and gas revenues.  

In spite of the wealth that extraction has brought, conflict, corruption, human rights violations, and environmental degradation are commonplace across the region, and a number of these problems can be attributed to mismanagement and poor governance in the extractive sector. It is critical that governance in the extractive sector improves in order for natural resources to help the region grow sustainably while providing for poor communities.

Building on this spirit, and as part of the USAID-funded IKAT-US project (Inisiatif Kemitraan Asia Tenggara – United States), the Revenue Watch Institute, the Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR) and other regional partners from Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam have been working together to develop a regional framework to better govern extractive industries in the region. The goal is to create a region-wide civil society proposal to the Association of Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN). The framework will be developed further in March 2014 during the ASEAN People’s Forum in Myanmar, a mechanism established for civil society to contribute to development.

On 16 and 17 December, 2013, civil society partners from the region traveled to Jakarta to develop the regional framework on extractive industries. IESR took the leading role in providing the first draft, obtaining inputs from other civil society partners. The discussions were focused on principles of better management of extractive industries, taking into account elements of good governance, respect for human rights, environmental protection, and better economic policies towards the management of extractive sector.

In addition to broader discussions, IESR Director Fabby Tumiwa presented a draft regional framework during a multi-stakeholder panel discussion moderated by Revenue Watch. Tumiwa’s presentation focused on the existing ASEAN Charter and ministerial statements around good governance of extractive industries to ensure that framework language is consistent with ASEAN vision and values.

The basic principles proposed in the framework are as follows:

  • Natural resources should benefit the people in the region and contribute toward just and equitable development.
  • Extractive industries should ensure meaningful participation of local communities in the decision chain.
  • Licensing and contracts should be fair.
  • Spending of revenues coming from extractive industries should be transparent and benefit the public.

Both days of discussions generated significant response from attendees, reflecting the strong participation of influential civil society figures from across the region.

Noke Kiroyan, an Indonesian expert on mining and currently vice chairman of the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, suggested that before extraction of natural resources commenced a free prior and informed consent (FPIC) process should be in place. FPIC helps to secure a social license to operate and ensure that local communities are fully consulted and consent to extraction.

Although there are good international standards for managing the extractive sector in theory, a number of problems continue to arise in practice: many mining companies operating in Southeast Asia still fail to follow global standards. In response, speakers and participants at the meeting agreed that government should take more a more active role in enforcement of mining regulations; adopt good international practices in national laws; and punish companies that flout the rules. This can incentivize the rise of responsible mining in the region.     

Professor Emil Salim, currently the Chairman of the Advisory Council to the Indonesian president, highlighted the fact that most ASEAN countries’ economic growth is fueled by extraction of natural resources. He called upon ASEAN countries to start developing related downstream operations, such as smelters and refineries, to gain more value added from their natural resources. Professor Salim stressed that the governments in the region have a very crucial challenge and that taking decisions to change this market structure require courage.

Indonesia is currently working towards these goals. Beginning this month, new laws prohibit mining companies operating in Indonesia from exporting raw materials. Raw materials from minerals and coal must be processed in the country to better capture more of their value and create more local employment, all while precipitating technology transfer and increasing local knowledge and skills.

Prof. Salim also advocated for the adoption and effective implementation of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) by governments in the region, concluding: “Transparency is the key concept here to ensure that citizens are well informed about the decisions made by their governments and the industry so that they can actively participate in public debates to ensure sustainability of resource use and intergenerational justice.”

Morentalisa Hutapea is an IESR program officer. Emanuel Bria is RWI’s senior regional associate for Asia-Pacific.

Related content

Countries Struggling with Governance Manage $1.2 Trillion in Resource Wealth

David MihalyiAnna Fleming
8 September 2017

OGP: Shedding Light on Natural Resource Management in Asia Pacific

Roslita ArsyadEmanuel Bria
15 August 2014

Advancing Accountable Resource Governance in Asia Pacific 2019

Event type: 
Training
Monday, September 30, 2019 - 09:00 to Saturday, October 5, 2019 - 18:00
Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Asia-Pacific Regional Knowledge Hub Course

Event type: 
Training
Monday, January 9, 2017 - 09:00 to Saturday, January 21, 2017 - 17:00
Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Close to Home: The Critical Importance of Subnational Governance in Oil, Gas and Mining

Daniel KaufmannRebecca Iwerks
27 September 2016
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search