Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Natural Resource Fiscal Transparency Code Represents Important Step Toward Harmonized Global Standards

31 October 2016
Author
Nicola Woodroffe
Topics
Beneficial ownershipGlobal initiativesMandatory payment disclosure
Stakeholders
Civil society actorsGovernment officialsJournalists and mediaParliaments and political partiesPrivate sector
Precepts
P2 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

Since 2007, the International Monetary Fund has played a key role in setting global standards for extractive sector fiscal transparency. That year, the fund released its Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency and the accompanying Guide on Resource Revenue Transparency. The latest draft of the Natural Resource Fiscal Transparency Code is a continuation of this benchmarking.

This latter document adapts the recently issued Fiscal Transparency Code (FTC) to resource-rich countries’ specific public financial management concerns. Potentially, it could spur important improvements in extractive sector stewardship.

To its credit, the IMF conducted extensive consultation in developing the Natural Resource FTC. The latest draft incorporates many changes proposed by the Natural Resource Governance Institute and other organizations during the first consultation period.

Improvements include a strengthened definition for “beneficial owner,” requiring disclosure of natural person or publicly listed company owners. Importantly, this ensures the definition does not allow for disclosure of private companies as owners, behind which identities of individuals can be hidden. The latest draft also requires disclosure of beneficial ownership as “basic” practice, in keeping with requirements of the 2016 EITI Standard. Such disclosure of ultimate owners can help deter and detect corruption, conflicts of interest and tax evasion.

Other strong revisions include disclosure of company payments to governments disaggregated by project as “good” practice. Further, the document now specifies that payments must be disclosed by government payee and payment type at all levels of practice, in keeping with both the mandatory disclosure laws passed in recent years and the 2016 EITI Standard.

Publication of environmental and social impact assessments that can enhance stakeholder ability to understand the full costs of extraction have also been included.

One of the most important roles the Natural Resource FTC can play is in promoting harmonized approaches to transparency in the extractive sector, building on other international and national initiatives. In NRGI’s most recently submitted comments, we have suggested tightening alignment with the EITI Standard and existing mandatory disclosure laws on definition and reporting of beneficial ownership, and on the definition of “project” for the purposes of reporting company payments to governments for the right to extract natural resources. We have also suggested strengthening the transparency provisions for award of licenses, including publication of prequalification criteria and evaluation criteria for competitive bids at all levels of practice.

As the IMF looks to finalize the Natural Resource FTC, the greatest challenge will be translating these powerful provisions into meaningful improvements in transparency and governance. So far, the IMF has conducted 18 fiscal transparency evaluations (FTEs), assessments based on the principles of the Fiscal Transparency Code, to identify vulnerabilities and set reform priorities. Twelve of these have been published to date. Increased uptake and publication of FTEs could boost accountability and bolster extractives sector management in countries where this sector matters most.

Nicola Woodroffe is a legal analyst at the Natural Resource Governance Institute.

Related content

At International Anti-Corruption Conference, Calls for Sustained—and Heightened—Vigilance

Max George-Wagner
16 December 2016

Natural Resource Charter Benchmarking Framework: 170 Crucial Questions for Resource-Rich Countries

Robert PitmanDavid Manley
17 October 2016

Six Transparency Steps Toward Better Extractives Governance in Ukraine

Robert Pitman
7 August 2017

Closing the Gap: Strengthening the Development and Implementation of Natural Resource Commitments in the Open Government Partnership

13 November 2017

What’s the Deal? Evolving Practices in Contract Transparency

Event type: 
Discussion
Thursday, June 28, 2018 - 15:30 to 17:00
Berlin, Germany
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search