Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Uncovering the Impacts of Phosphate Mining on Tunisian Women

22 January 2018
Author
Hanen KeskesWiem Melki
Topics
Civic spaceRevenue sharingState-owned enterprisesSubnational governanceGender
Countries
Tunisia
Stakeholders
Civil society actors
Precepts
P1 P3 P5 P7 P12 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

العربية

Phosphate mining has long served as an important component of Tunisia’s economy—phosphate rock is used domestically to produce fertilizer and is also a valuable export. But some regions that are richest in phosphate reserves are also some of the most marginalized. Citizens in these regions’ say the government doesn’t provide them with the political voice and economic opportunities they seek, and that the state-owned Gafsa Phosphate Company (CPG) uses opaque recruitment processes that does not offer locals a clear path to working for the industry’s biggest employer.
 
In 2008, citizens in the phosphate-producing region of Gafsa organized protests against this marginalization and suffered a government crackdown. Called the “Mining Basin uprising,” the unrest seriously disrupted phosphate production, and nearly a decade later unrest continues to sporadically erupt over many of the issues that caused the initial protests—low employment, weak regional development, inadequate mitigation of the negative environmental impact of phosphate production, and the inequitable distribution of phosphate revenues. The cost of the unrest is considerable, with phosphate production falling from 8 million tons in 2010 to 3.1 million tons in 2017. Government officials blame protestors for the decrease in CPG’s activity. However, the root problems that caused the discontent remain unaddressed in a systematic manner. Gafsa still lacks basic public services and infrastructure, and the unemployment rate remains the second highest in the country, at 28.2 percent against a national rate of 15.6 percent in 2016.
 
While natural resource-related discontent in Gafsa remains largely unaddressed by policy-makers and underreported by the media—leading to a lack of awareness amongst the Tunisian public and international donors—even more underreported are the disproportionate negative effects that phosphate production has on women. To begin understanding these gendered effects, the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI) held a consultative meeting with female activists in Gafsa on 28 December. The key findings from the consultation revolve around three themes: employment, health, and pollution and infrastructure.   
 
Employment
 
While the lack of employment opportunities is a major issue for all populations in Gafsa, it disproportionately affects women. The region’s unemployment rate amongst female university graduates is 54 percent while it is 27 percent amongst male graduates. This disparity holds when it comes to the ratio of women to men employed at CPG and affiliated institutions. Additionally, most of the women employed by the company are cleaners—this despite the region’s high percentage of female university graduates. (Forty-seven percent of all Gafsa women hold a university degree.)
 
Health
 
Phosphate production has negative health effects on Gafsa’s population as a whole, according to activists, who say that women disproportionately suffer: They experience a high rate of miscarriages, as well as neonatal problems that go untreated due to a lack of services in the area. Activist Nawwara Bedhief, president of Sanad, states that “seven percent of children in the Mining Basin region of Mdhilla are born with birth defects due to women’s exposure to uranium present in phosphate deposits.” Consultation participants also cited negative psychological effects from phosphate production. For example, water and air pollution caused by the production causes damage to women’s skin, teeth and hair (leading to decreased self-esteem and confidence).
 
Pollution and infrastructure
 
Phosphate production leads to a high level of dust and air pollution. Dusting and cleaning is the responsibility of women in Gafsa’s households, and the chore is made especially arduous by the added phosphate dust and grime; women are forced to spend time, effort and money cleaning that could be used on leisure, education and other pursuits. Cleaning is made even more difficult by water shortages, which is a direct result of phosphate production. Activist and human rights advocate Mannena Zitouni said that water is “scarce, undrinkable, and of very poor quality.”
 
Promoting evidence-based, local responses to gender impacts
 
The main takeaways from NRGI’s meeting with female stakeholders revolved around two themes for further action.
 
Empowering local civil society to play a more concerted and coordinated role in demanding inclusion in decision-making
 
Local civil society actors must consolidate their efforts so that they can present a unified set of demands for inclusion in decision-making processes related to phosphate’s negative impacts. Local civil society organizations stand to benefit from their inclusion in the NRGI-supported Tunisian Coalition for Transparency in Energy and Mines (CTTEM), or from opening a direct line of communication with its regional coordinator (either of which could help elevate their demands and recommendations to the national level).
 
Supporting evidence-based advocacy through the commissioning of studies on phosphate’s environmental and societal impacts in the region
 
Civil society actors’ effectiveness in influencing decision-making is only possible if they can rely on informed, evidence-based accounts of impacts. Though anecdotal evidence abounds, there is a serious dearth of rigorous studies that definitively link phosphate mining to the various problems that are affecting citizens in Gafsa. NRGI is helping to address this by supporting its local partner and CTTEM regional coordinator—Association Bassin Minier pour l’Investissement et le Développement (ABMID)—to undertake a study on the environmental impacts of phosphate production. The study will gather and present data on the various environmental and health effects of phosphate extraction and has the potential to spark an informed debate on the government’s and other actors’ roles in mitigating phosphate-related damage and providing compensation. Many more studies of this kind need to be commissioned.
 
Hanen Keskes is the Middle East and North Africa regional associate at the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI). Wiem Melki is NRGI’s Tunisia program associate. 

Related content

لعنة الفسفاط على نساء قفصة

Hanen KeskesWiem Melki
5 February 2018

Natural Resource Charter Benchmarking Framework: 170 Crucial Questions for Resource-Rich Countries

Robert PitmanDavid Manley
17 October 2016

NRGI’s Top 10 Blog Posts in 2016

13 December 2016

Open Government Partnership Global Summit 2016

Event type: 
Conference
Monday, December 5, 2016 - 08:00 to Friday, December 9, 2016 - 17:00
Paris, France

May 2015 Letter from the President

14 May 2015
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search