Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Will Transparency Gains Ensure Petroleum Contract Stability Under Mexico’s New President?

18 July 2018
Author
Thomas Lassourd
Topics
Contract transparency and monitoringLegislation and regulationLicensing and negotiation
Countries
Mexico
Stakeholders
Civil society actorsGovernment officialsJournalists and mediaPrivate sector
Precepts
P2 P3 P11 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

In many resource-rich countries, new governments have tended be skeptical of deals signed with extractives companies under previous administrations. In the last 15 years, incoming presidents in Bolivia, Venezuela, Guinea or Sierra Leone have attempted to renegotiate some or all of them.

In Mexico, where President-elect Andrés Manuel López Obrador won an historic presidential election in June, investors in the recently opened oil and gas sectors are wondering whether the contracts they signed with the country’s hydrocarbon regulator since the first bidding round in 2015 are safe.

They certainly have reasons to be worried. During the electoral campaign, AMLO expressed a very negative view of the energy reform and announced an entirely different approach to the sector. Nevertheless, it’s unlikely that the new administration will take bold steps against oil and gas contracts already signed and investments already made. There are several reasons for this.

First, López Obrador has demonstrated in his previous role as Mexico City mayor that he is a pragmatist willing to work with the private sector to deliver on his promises.

Second, the new government’s biggest challenge is the corruption and violence associated with drug trafficking, and it will not be willing to engage in other political battles at the same time.

Third, rolling back the energy reform and requiring state-owned oil and gas company Pemex to undertake all exploration and production might prove too costly, and would go against the stated objective to increase Mexico’s energy self-sufficiency.

Last, but not least, the bidding rounds themselves and the monitoring of contracts allocated to private investors have followed a very transparent process that would prove hard to challenge.

Every step of the three bidding rounds that have already taken place since 2015 is documented, recorded and published on the National Hydrocarbons Commission’s (CNH) website: which companies participated, who won, what the bidding criteria were, how the process was organized, which government officials were involved and their official declarations of interests. Mexican citizens and international observers alike can follow the contract allocation and monitoring process closely. They can even watch it in a livestream. There is much less space for mistakes or impropriety in such a process.

CNH has even gone further, submitting transparency processes to Mexican civil society organizations. These organizations have demanded additional progress on disclosing the identity of beneficial owners of all companies participating in bidding rounds, more information on social impact assessments, and additional regulatory transparency on Pemex’s activities. While CNH could make further progress on these elements, other countries are impressed enough with the ambitious steps taken by the Mexican regulator that they are trying to learn from their example.

López Obrador has already moderated his language, from more aggressive stances against private investment during the early stages of his campaign to a more conciliatory tone after winning the elections. Hydrocarbon contracts already allocated will be reviewed for graft, according to Alfonso Romo, the head of the president-elect’s transition team and his future chief of staff. The president elect himself has stated that if wrongdoing is identified, his government will appeal to national and international courts to deal with the situation, ruling out expropriations as a response. In turn, in an official reaction, the governing body of the regulatory agency seemed confident its transparency standards and adherence to the law would help it easily comply with the review.

Where the new administration is more likely to break from the previous one is in future allocations. Rocío Nahle, a legislator and López Obrador’s top energy aide, has stated that the new administration would not immediately propose changes to existing laws. But they could slow down the pace of allocating licenses, or stop it altogether, especially where oil exploration conflicts with people’s livelihoods. The exploration of shale resources, which is being piloted by the outgoing energy secretary this year, is a move many activists oppose.

Over the next year, the steps taken by López Obrador’s administration in the energy sector should show the value of transparency in resource contracts allocation for investor comfort and to build citizens’ trust in the process. This will only strengthen a growing global trend in favor of contract transparency and encourage more investors to publicly support high levels of disclosure.

Thomas Lassourd is a senior economic analyst with the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI).

Related content

Lanzamiento de reporte: Administración de transparencia de contratos y la Comisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos de México

Event type: 
Discussion
Wednesday, January 18, 2017 - 18:00 to 19:30
Ciudad de México

Las mejores prácticas internacionales de transparencia en la gestión de contratos: recomendaciones para la Comisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos

17 January 2017

International Best Practices for Transparency in Contract Management: Recommendations for Mexico

17 January 2017

NRGI’s Top 10 Blog Posts in 2016

13 December 2016

How and Why the Myanmar Government Should Publish Petroleum and Mining Contracts

Briefing
27 May 2019
Sebastian SahlaHosana ChayRobert Pitman
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search