Skip to main content
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Search

Natural Resource Governance Institute

  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Economic diversification
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Revenue sharing
    Civic space
    Energy transition
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Sovereign wealth funds
    Commodity prices
    Gender
    Measurement of governance
    State-owned enterprises
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Global initiatives
    Open data
    Subnational governance
    Coronavirus
    Legislation and regulation
    Revenue management
    Tax policy and revenue collection
    Corruption
    Licensing and negotiation
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
      • Civil society actors
      • Government officials
      • Journalists and media
      • Parliaments and political parties
      • Private sector
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Countries
    NRGI Priority Countries
    Colombia
    Guinea
    Nigeria
    Tanzania
    Dem. Rep. of Congo
    Mexico
    Peru
    Tunisia
    Ghana
    Mongolia
    Senegal
    Uganda
    OTHER COUNTRIES
  • Learning
    • Training
      • Residential training courses
        • Executive
        • Anglophone Africa
        • Francophone Africa
        • Asia-Pacific
        • Eurasia
        • Latin America
        • Middle East and North Africa
      • Online training courses
        • Advanced
        • Negotiating Contracts
        • Massive open online course (MOOC)
        • Interactive course: Petronia
      • Trainers' modules
        • (empty)
    • Primers
    • Glossary
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
      • 2020-2025 Strategy
      • Country prioritization
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Events
  • Blog

You are here

  1. Home
  2. News

May 2015 Letter from the President

14 May 2015
Topics
Beneficial ownershipCivic spaceCommodity pricesContract transparency and monitoringCorruptionEconomic diversificationGlobal initiativesLegislation and regulationLicensing and negotiationMandatory payment disclosureMeasurement of governanceMeasurement of environmental and social impactsOpen dataRevenue managementRevenue sharingSovereign wealth fundsState-owned enterprisesSubnational governanceTax policy and revenue collection
Countries
AzerbaijanCanadaUnited States
Stakeholders
Civil society actorsGovernment officialsJournalists and mediaParliaments and political partiesPrivate sector
Precepts
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 What are Natural Resource Charter precepts?
Social Sharing

Dear friends and colleagues,

I write to share some NRGI developments and a few thoughts in the midst of what admittedly are uncertain times globally.

Let me first focus on the shrinking civil society space in many resource-rich countries. Further entrenchment of authoritarian governments (in increasingly “managed” democracies) and the radicalization of factions that oppose them has resulted in increased civil strife and violence, and a squeeze on civic space in the middle.

Add to this the economic slowdown in Europe and China, the recent drop in commodity prices, and high-level corruption scandals in a number of countries, and it is evident that we are facing a new and complex reality. This current environment of multiple “lows”—low tolerance, low prices, and low growth—poses fresh challenges as well as opportunities, and warrants rethinking and adaptation, including for us at NRGI.

The picture is particularly grim in many oil-rich countries, such as Azerbaijan, Russia and Venezuela. We have found that in most resource-rich countries, many of which are members of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), the now-past period of high prices coincided with growing constraints on civil society.

This is of grave concern, since civil society engagement is essential if transparency initiatives are to be effective in making governments accountable to their citizens. Recently, a concerted push led to EITI’s adoption of a protocol for assessment of civil society environments in EITI countries. The protocol is already being applied in practice: Azerbaijan has just been held to account by the EITI international board (on which I serve) and the country has been downgraded from “compliant” to “candidate” status. At issue is the systematic and growing government-led persecution of civil society leaders and organizations. During my visit to Baku last week (to present at the Asian Development Bank annual meetings), I met with many stakeholders to review and discuss the multiple challenges faced by civil society in Azerbaijan, and I participated in constructive discussions aimed at moving the country out of dire straits.

When harnessed accountably, oil is still a valuable national asset, even if its market value has fallen; likewise with minerals. With the plunge in commodity prices has come much understandable anxiety, in many corners—from ministry offices and legislative chambers to corporate executive suites. In fact, extractive companies face a rather different reality today, due to the drop in prices; the changing landscape in governance and politics; and enhanced scrutiny of corporate accountability, tax avoidance and corruption. Engaging with companies, as well as governments, civil society, parliaments and media, is an integral part of NRGI’s strategy.

With partners, we are working on the challenges and opportunities brought by lower prices, including in areas of governance improvements, such as reductions in inefficient, unequitable and fiscally onerous subsidies; the revamp of state companies and natural resource funds; and approaches to improving subnational governance and addressing corruption in extractives.

In the past boom decade, innovations in natural resource analysis, policy advice and advocacy surfaced, yet the actual implementation of governance and policy reforms in the extractives sector fell short. We must learn from this experience if decisive progress is to take place in the coming decade. We must operate more effectively by infusing technocratic solutions with a smart dose of governance and political economy considerations. The causes and consequences of Brazil’s Petrobras corruption scandal make up one cautionary tale about the risk of over-reliance on technocratic solutions alone. Similarly, sensible strategies and reform initiatives (such as the revamp of the national oil company) by Nigeria’s new government must address corruption in key institutions while taking into account political incentives.

It is also the case that that the drop in oil prices can be used as a fig leaf. While some governments may point to low prices as an explanation for their troubles, the fundamental determinants of their woes are more self-inflicted than external: in countries like Venezuela, Ghana and Sierra Leone, prior mismanagement and misguided policies are the root cause.

Meanwhile, we at NRGI are deepening our capacity building and shared learning offerings, such as the recently completed natural resource global course with the Central European University in Budapest, an innovative training of trainers held in Bogota, and the regional training on data in extractives held in Istanbul. We launched an online reader series on key aspects of oil, gas and mining governance, and look forward to a flagship course with senior policy-makers to be held with the Blavatnik School at Oxford University, as well as the upcoming regional summer course in Africa.

Encouragingly, we are also witnessing some results from the hard policy analysis and advocacy work around mandatory disclosure of extractive companies’ payments to governments. Statoil’s watershed reporting and Tullow’s now-annual project-level disclosures show that some companies recognize the benefits of transparency and are taking initiative, in some cases prodded by new regulations. Yet even as moves by Statoil and Tullow undermine the oil lobby’s arguments against transparency, most of the oil majors are still stuck in the opacity of the past.

Governments in the industrialized world, often unduly influenced by industry, must step up as well: further progress on implementing payment disclosure legislation ought to take place in the coming months in the UK, US and Canada. In tandem with securing these revenue transparency gains, we will work on furthering the disclosure of contracts and the identities of beneficial owners of extractive companies. Transparency is a prerequisite for advancement that we have yet to fully attain.

We face a landscape with many challenges and crises, but also new opportunities. We look forward to making progress in partnership with you all.

Best regards,
Daniel Kaufmann
President, Natural Resource Governance Institute

The Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI) helps people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals. We do this through technical advice, advocacy, applied research, policy analysis, and capacity development. We work with innovative agents of change within government ministries, civil society, the media, legislatures, the private sector, and international institutions to promote accountable and effective governance in the extractive industries. For more information, please see: www.resourcegovernance.org.

Related content

NRGI’s Top 10 Blog Posts in 2016

13 December 2016

A 2017 Year-End Message from NRGI President and CEO Daniel Kaufmann

Daniel Kaufmann
14 December 2017

2018 Natural Resource Governance Institute Training Courses

15 December 2017

ТРЕХЭТАПНЫЙ КУРС "ПРИРОДНЫЕ РЕСУРСЫ ДЛЯ УСТОЙЧИВОГО РАЗВИТИЯ"

Event type: 
Training
Monday, March 25, 2019 - 09:45 to Friday, June 28, 2019 - 09:45
Baku, Azerbaijan

Natural Resources for Sustainable Development Multi-Course Mode

Event type: 
Training
Monday, March 25, 2019 - 07:30 to Friday, June 28, 2019 - 07:30
Baku, Azerbaijan
Helping people to realize the benefits of their countries’ endowments of oil, gas and minerals.
Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Subscribe to Updates
  • Topics
    Beneficial ownership
    Civic space
    Commodity prices
    Contract transparency and monitoring
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Economic diversification
    Energy transition
    Gender
    Global initiatives
    Legislation and regulation
    Licensing and negotiation
    Mandatory payment disclosure
    Measurement of environmental and social impacts
    Measurement of governance
    Open data
    Revenue management
    Revenue sharing
    Sovereign wealth funds
    State-owned enterprises
    Subnational governance
    Tax policy and revenue collection
  • Approach
    • Stakeholders
    • Natural Resource Charter
    • Regional knowledge hubs
  • Priority
    Countries
    • Colombia
    • Dem. Rep. of Congo
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nigeria
    • Peru
    • Senegal
    • Tanzania
    • Tunisia
    • Uganda
  • Learning
    • Training
    • Primers
  • Analysis & Tools
    • Publications
    • Tools
    • Economic models
  • About Us
    • What we do
    • NRGI impact
    • Board of Directors
    • Emeritus Board Members
    • Advisory Council
    • Leadership team
    • Experts and staff
    • Careers and opportunities
    • Grant-making
    • Financials
    • Privacy policy
    • Contact us
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Search